帮写留先生功课栏目供给最新帮写留先生功课格局、帮写留先生功课硕士论文范文。概况征询QQ:869156324(颁发);357500023(论文教导)

英国功课剽窃率是几多?

日期:2020年03月08日 编辑:ad200904242025371901 作者:龙8 论文网 点击次数:2015
论文价钱:0元 论文编号:lw202002292022259088 论笔墨数:2928 所属栏目:帮写留先生功课
论文地域:其余 论文语种:中文 论文用处:论文写作指点 Instruction

在英国留学的不少同窗,应当对百般百般的功课写作是倍感压力的,除英文程度要跟得上,还要熟习各种功课各个方面的请求。出格是在阐发阐述相干深度标题题目进程中,本身多方面缺乏的处所都裸露了,以是这时辰良多同窗会挑选走捷径去间接剽窃copy别人的论点论据、信息资料,英文对应的词叫做plagiarism。采用剽窃的体例固然能够为本身节流大批的时候和精神,可是其带来的赏罚效果倒是很是严峻的,在英国极度情形乃至能够被学校遏制学业遣前往国。

英国的媒体对此也有相干新闻,比方作为英国顶级学府的罗素大学团体有项外部统计数据,在停止2017年的三年之间,先生的做弊率足足增添了30%之多,而这此中剽窃率则进献了绝大局部比例,引发了英国教育部分的高度正视。以是龙8在做各项功课时,必然要注重剽窃率的标题题目,能够本身经由过程手动或各种查重软件停止主动查抄,确保本身做的功课不要和剽窃粘上边。

那末,英国功课的剽窃率是几多呢?普通来讲,英国粹校和导师对你的功课停止剽窃率检测时,若是在某段话外面发明有跨越12个字和其余文献不异或和其余论点及其类似,那就比拟风险了,由于须要援用不少的文献来论证,以是全篇会有必然的类似度(注重reference要援用适当),但这个比例不要跨越30%为好。


上面是一篇今年的优良英国功课的范文,大师参考时能够连系剽窃率的标题题目停止对比:


Critique of Taylorism and Scientific Management Theory

 英国功课剽窃率

As industrialization advanced rapidly across the world at the turn of the twentieth century, it transformed working practices and prompted theorists to consider how best to conduct business under such changed circumstances. The theory of scientific management has its roots in the studies conducted by F. W. Taylor during this formative period (see Taylor, 1911). There is much debate in the secondary literature about the synonymy of Taylorism and scientific management, which this paper does not discuss (for further details see, Caldari, 2007; Nelson, 1992). Rather, this paper positions Taylor as the defining early influence in a continuum of scientific approaches to organizational management – all of which fall under the broader definition of scientific management and management science – that endures today. Section 1 of this paper undertakes a critical evaluation of scientific management theory before going on in Section 2 to discuss how and to what extent it is applied at the organisation, Microsoft.


Critical Evaluation of Scientific Management Theory

Taylor was one of the first theorists to consider management and process improvement as a scientific problem and, as such, is widely considered the father of scientific management. He proposed that a business’s economic efficiency could be improved by simplifying and optimising work processes, which would, in turn, increase productivity. Taylorism, as a philosophy, was the product of a series of experiments and observations, such as time-motion studies, designed to determine the most effective and efficient way to complete a task. Its fundamental and inter-related principles can be summarised as follows:


Using scientific method to challenge habitual working practices and to determine the most efficient way to perform specific work tasks;

Matching workers’ capability and motivation to the task requirements and supervising them according to the established rules and procedures;

Establishing fair performance levels and develop a pay system that rewards, and therefore encourages, over-achievement; and

Appropriate division of responsibilities to allow managers to apply scientific management principles to plan work and ensure workers are effective.

Taylor’s work influenced a number of other contemporaneous theorists, such as Frank and Lillian Gilbreth, and, later, Henry Gantt, who also favoured empirical methods to determine the most efficient procedures. Indeed, his new scientific system of organisation was met initially with widespread support in the USA and Great Britain amongst theorists, politicians and economists alike (Nelson, 1992). However, Taylor’s scientific management was not without its critics, both at the time and subsequently. By the 1930s and 40s it had broadly fallen out of favour. The following section undertakes a critical evaluation of scientific management. It discusses the arguments of Taylorism’s detractors and also explores its legacy in popular modes of management practice today.


One of the most popular criticisms levelled at Taylorism is its perceived lack of human appreciation (Caldari, 2007). In the drive to increase physical efficiency, it considers the worker a part of the production process on a level equal to the tools s/he uses and, as such, strips him or her of all capacity to reason and act autonomously. All thinking and planning is taken over by